Mercedes engine was developed by AMG subsidiary specializing in the manufacture of sports Mercedes models. ML 6.3 engine is one of the few engines C8 market that have turbo. In the Range Rover, the engine is considerably smaller volume of only 5 liters, which helps to lower consumption.
| 2010 Mercedes ML 63 AMG | 2010 Range Rover Sport Supercharged | Mercedes
Points (0-10) |
Range Rover
Points (0-10) |
|
| Engine | V8 / 6208 | V8 / 5000 | 6 | 9 |
| Horse power | 510 @ 6800 | 510 @ 6500 | 9 | 9 |
| Torque USA (lb-ft @ rpm)
EU ( NM @ rpm) |
465 @ 5200 | 461 @ 6500 | 8 | 8 |
| 630 @ 5200 | 625 @ 6500 | |||
| Fuel economy USA(mpg)
EU(L/100 km) |
14 mpg | 16 mpg | 5 | 8 |
| 16.5 | 14.9 | |||
| Wight USA (lbs.)
EU (kg.) |
5198 | 5860 | 8 | 5 |
| 2358 | 2658 | |||
| 0-60 mph / (0-100 km/h) | 5.2 sec. | 5.4 sec. | 7 | 6 |
| 0-125 mph / (0-200 km/h) | 18.8 sec. | 19.9 sec. | 8 | 7 |
| Ground clearance USA(in.)
EU (mm) |
7.7 – 9.8 | 4.7 – 8.2 | 8 | 6 |
| 195 – 250 | 120 – 210 | |||
| Maximum load USA (lbs.)
EU (kg.) |
1150 | 1029 | 8 | 7 |
| 522 | 467 | |||
| Attachment capacity (with brake / without brake) USA (lbs.)
EU (kg.) |
7716/1653 | 7716/1653 | 7 | 7 |
| 3500/750 | 3500/750 | |||
| Maximum speed | 158 mph | 142 mph | 8 | 4 |
| 255 km/h | 229 km/h | |||
| CO2 | 392 | 348 | 5 | 7 |
| MSRPrise USA | $91,050 | $73,345 | 5 | 9 |
| 60-0 mph (100-0 km/h) USA(ft.)
EU (meters) |
118 ft. | 121 ft. | 8 | 7 |
| 36 metters | 37 meters | |||
| Ride comfort | 8 | 7 | ||
| Handling on the road | 8 | 6 | ||
| Handling off road | 7 | 7 | ||
| Space inside the car | 9 | 7 | ||
| Design | 8 | 6 | ||
| Final Result | 140 | 132 | ||
From Lan dRover are offset by the small size of the turbo engine. The power of both engines is completely the same 510 horsepower. The lack of turbo in ML help for sensitive response of the throttle. Torque in both cars is the same honors with very little advantage for Mercedes. The weight of the ML 63 is significantly less than that of Rank eRover (300 kg.), Which is the main reason for better acceleration. Speed limiter in the Range Rover is quite radical 229 km / h, while the Mercedes top speed is 255 km / h. In extreme drive ML is presented much better way, mostly because of its small weight. Both cars
have air suspension with the possibility of regulating clearance. Qualities of both cars off the road are the same honors. Weight distribution in Rank eRover exactly 50/50% at Mercedes burden is distributed 55 percent front and 45% back which is caused by the gravity of the big engine. Mercede
s brake system developed by AMG, is presented much better than its competitor. In ML difference between warm and cold no brakes honors, while Rank eRover presentation of the braking system at high temperature is deteriorated significantly. However, both cars are far from ceramic system ekaaenn Porsche Turbo S. cabin noise and honors both cars is identical, about 68 decibels at 130 km / h (80 mph).
Our advice: The difference in price is about $ 17,0
00, which is a pretty car with very similar qualities. Mercedes is presented better in acceleration and maximum speed driving is also in favor of ML. For road off type qualities of both cars are identical honors. If you are interested in price, Mercedes is the right choice. Regarding price – quality is the winner Range Rover Sport Supercharged.
Other Posts :
Related posts:
- 1 millionth Range Rover
- Range Rover SPORT CONQUEROR II HAMANN- Motorsport
- Mercedes E350 CGI vs BMW 535i 2011 models
- Audi Q7 V12 TDI vs ML 63 AMG 2010 models
- Jaguar and Land Rover will make new engines alone
0 Comments
You can be the first one to leave a comment.